Standardise verification steps
Apply defined checks consistently to supported transactions.
Add consistent checks before high-risk payment changes.
Support vendor verification and payment-review workflows with change detection, permitted third-party checks and clear escalation rules. The application helps reviewers identify unusual changes; it does not guarantee prevention of fraud or sanctions breaches.
Apply defined checks consistently to supported transactions.
Highlight bank-account or beneficiary changes for additional confirmation.
Show which checks ran and why a case was flagged.
Illustrative impact - example only
Standardise verification steps
Illustrative calculation 4,000 x 60% = 2,400
In this hypothetical example, 2,400 records could receive preliminary checks. Human sign-off and downstream screening remain governed separately.
Illustrative scenario, not a measured client result or guarantee. Actual outcomes depend on scope, data, controls and adoption.
What we would measure
Surface changed vendor details
Measurement approach only - not a measured client result or guarantee. Measures and baseline are agreed with you during discovery.
What we would measure
Make risk reviews auditable
Measurement approach only - not a measured client result or guarantee. Measures and baseline are agreed with you during discovery.
Potential extensions, scoped separately
A vendor change or payment enters the workflow.
Run authorised checks against agreed rules.
Record the outcome and the reasons.
Act through existing payment controls.
Screening-data coverage varies by jurisdiction and provider; access follows existing controls.
No payment is released automatically on an unverified match; segregation of duties is retained.
Approval chains and a full audit trail of checks and decisions.
Start with one vendor-change or release process. In a 30-minute discussion we look at how it could work in your environment.
Choose a 30-minute conversation or send us a short enquiry - whichever works for you.